Included within: brief explorations of my head, forced extrovertedness in the form of obsessive idea consumerism, and fanatic art and design adoration.
Mood:
Topic: Oh So Shiny
Most of the time I window shop online and scoff at the ridiculous prices of clothing and home items. Then, sometimes I find something so perfect, or that would so perfectly fit what I want it for that I only wish I could afford the ridiculous prices of it. I've got two today:
Mohop shoes provide near limitless sandel designs with one shoe sole. I love this idea!

I think, perhaps, I might not feel as self conscious in Popina swimsuits. The styles are so flattering. (via Indie Fixx)

Mood:
Topic: Futurism
The article on Technovelgy, Flesh-Eating robot reasearch is languishing (via i09), is great! The little guy on the right was designed to identify the taste of wines, cheeses, and hors d'oeuvres. It identified a reporter's hand as bacon! One day we will all be subjugated by our robotic progeny who will classify, keep, and enjoy us like pork!
Mood:
Topic: Ignore me please
I am not a scientist. I did fairly well in science in school and have always been interested but I found out in college that the teaching best suited to my type of learning was not the type of teaching that usually occurred in a science classroom. Thus, all of my scientific explorations and contemplations have been done in my own way. Bear with me then, as I hypothesize based on news about scientists testing early human bones to find out if modern man was a mix of early humans and neanderthals.
As I remember, in science class so long ago, it was impressed upon me that early humans and Neanderthals were two different species. At that time the idea of modern humans coming from a mix of the two was considered ludicrous--even though I thought it made the most sense. One of the much used refutations of the intermixing idea was that two species cannot have fertile offspring.
Well, apparently, the idea of intermixing has been more and more entertained since I was in science class due to some skulls that seem to be a perfect blending of the two species. With the new and improved DNA testing and an uncontaminated sample of an early human, scientists have affirmed that the DNA shows no intermixing.
That was a long intro to get to my thoughts, but bear with me please. My question is: did the uncontaminated sample have the type of skull that shows possible blending? I know its probably a sample taken after Neanderthals began vanishing, given that they thought it was a good sample to show whether modern human was descendant from a mix of the two species. What I figure is that there is no way to say for sure that the two species weren't intermixing. If the product of two separate species is sterile--as seen in mules and ligers--couldn't those skulls with both characteristics be evidence of interbreeding which created sterile individuals? Perhaps this could've even contributed to the Neanderthal decline. Although, I have to admit I know even less about the Neanderthal decline.
Now as I'm writing this and clearly talking out of no where, I'm thinking that you will be wondering why I'm even talking at all. Yeah, I don't know really. But I let my mind wander some times. And the louder it wanders, the more I want to share.
Mood:
Topic: miscellanea

Mood:
Topic: Seriously
The One Hundred Artists Project is available for purchase! I just received my ordered copy and was oh so proud and happy to be included in this project. Yup, I said included. My humble contribution on the right.
So far, the project hasn't managed to drum up the attention I think it deserves. Anyone interested in keeping tabs on the situation or joining in future projects should check out the 100 Artists Project network. Proceeds from sales and art auctions go to the Comic Book Legal Defense Fund and the Hero Initiative.
I first heard about it on Drawn! and thought that maybe I could finally get off my butt and participate in an art project with other artists, for a good cause even. So what's keeping you?

Ai Shinohara's paintings are deceptively dreamy. I am particularly clumsy with a brush, so I can't help but admire the fine detail and variety of smooth color combination and blending. (via Right Some Good)
Mood:
Topic: Seriously
I've still been thinking about privacy issues and the forced invasion of mine and others right to keep certain pieces of information about ourselves private. I've also recently signed up for three more social networking sites. I even have a job in which I custodian of user information that I would not want shared should I be that user. Well, eventually the amalgamation of all this actually got combined into one thought and I queried, 'what exactly do I consider information to kept private?' (yes, I talk to myself)
The answer isn't simple. I am not even sure I have formulated the whole answer yet, and I'm sure that it would evolve and mutate with time and the current issues of my life, but I still think its a question that a lot of us should consider. There have already been articles concerning the vulnerability of online teens to future employer discrimination based on information shared on their myspace and facebook pages, the dangers of online shopping and keeping your passwords safe, and how the immediacy and exhibitionism of our online environments is causing changes in how we act as a society. I've even done a previous post on the mindset of people who do share themselves online. Obviously, I don't think visibility online is a bad thing. To me, the online world is just another dimension to the off line one. Granted, its another dimension with almost interminable universal memory--an ability that the offline world has yet to develop.
Because the stupid and/or embarrassing things I've done can never be erased, its helped me to own up to the fact that its ok to be perceived as stupid, geeky, embarrassing, what have you. Everybody is at some time, or thinks that they are. I also enjoy the record keeping aspect of it. More than old photos, online archives keep snapshots of how my life was year after year. And though a life online can be ego-stroking and a misguided attempt at permanence, I don't think my audience/circle of friends is any bigger online than offline.
Back to the topic at hand. I have publicly(through social networking sites) shared my music and movie tastes, some of my literature tastes, interests, daily thoughts, school and job information, location, social connections, craft production, artwork, and opinions on other artists, politics, and social commentary. I have shared through consumer relationships all of my literature tastes, my bath product preferences, my food choices, my banking and credit information, my travel habits, my shoe size, and my choices of extracurricular activities. I'm sure those companies have some more dirt on me that I'm just not thinking of at the moment. I expect and hope, that this data shared with my consumer relationships is being properly kept private or, at least, anonymized before it is disseminated for statistical purposes. Oddly enough, perhaps because of privacy policies I've read, I admit that I consider the identifying information I have given to my email provider, my Google log in, and YouTube login to be private in the same type of way. Here I am talking about the back-end information; the information that I cannot even see if I don't log into the system. My favorites list, my notebook pages, and my viewing history. I know my movements online are tracked and recorded. In some cases, like with Amazon, I even reap some benefits directly with their recommendation making system. I also know that outright selling/sharing of this type of information by any email service, profile offering search engine, etc would lose those sites the traffic that makes it possible for them to make any money. It will establish a level of distrust in users that will encompass even the parent and related organizations.
So, I've considered what I have already shared, and what I have shared with the understanding of privacy. What are those pieces of me that I want and need to remain private? Of course, I find it necissary to keep my banking and sensitive identifying information private. I also consider some of my reading, activity, and viewing proclivities to be sensitive information. And I have a strong desire to blip off the radar once and while. Maybe its an innate predator/prey paranoia, but I'd rather not all of my movements were recorded. What information about you do you feel needs to be protected the most?
Mood:
Topic: Oh So Shiny
Left to Right, top to bottom: JT Baby USBs over at Popgadget, Cina's lazer cut USB, Luminous Squid USB from SolidAlliance, Sushi USB at Shiny Shiny, Owly and Psy Mimobots, and the Robot USB. If that isn't enough to make you dream of paying 300% more for memory because its clad in a cool shell, then check out: 15 Unusual and Strange USB Drives.
Mood:
Topic: miscellanea
For those of you who have not already stumbled upon the ingenuitous-ness that is Kindertrauma, I am now sending you there to discover for yourself. Join the cathartic outpouring of horrific reminiscences, or just read my own traumafession. While you're there, go ahead and read Richard of DoomedMovieThon's very own (one of a couple?) traumafession as well.
Mood:
Topic: Oh So Shiny
Maleonn Ma working in Shanghai, China, creates some of the most amazing photographs I have ever seen. His concepts and execution form a both disconcerting and alluring world. I'm kind of at a loss for words.
From Unforgivable Children
From Days on the Cotton Candy
From Portrait of Mephisto
(thanks to i09)
Mood:
Topic: Seriously
I'm getting a little creeped out of my skin reading the BBC article on the Viacom vs Google case currently being contested. YouTube has been brought under fire in the past for allowing users to upload copyritten material and managed to come out of it ok. Now that Google owns YouTube, it looks like the court cases will begin again. Anyway, I fail to see why user viewing habits, IP addresses, usernames and passwords need to be known by Viacom though. They say its to prove that illicit material is more popular (any child psychologist could verify its probably true), but what does that matter any way. If the crux of their case is that their property is being uploaded and viewed on YouTube, it shouldn't matter how many or which individuals view it. And really, all videos on YouTube have a tag on how many times the video has been viewed--pulling the info with no personal information should be easy. That the court ruled in favor of surrendering personal user information has got me cooking up paranoid future scenarios for what the info will be used for in the future. From the article:
"Google must divulge the viewing habits of every user who has ever watched any video on YouTube, a US court has ruled.
The ruling comes as part of Google's legal battle with Viacom over allegations of copyright infringement."
"The viewing log, which will be handed to Viacom, contains the log-in ID of users, the computer IP address (online identifier) and video clip details."
I believe strongly that intellectual property should be protected, and that the freedom of its discrimination should be in the hands of its creator, and then secondly its owner in other fashions. I find it interesting however that issues of copyright and ownership have so successfully violated personal privacy. Where is the line to be drawn between what is evidence of intellectual property theft and what is theft in order to get evidence? More and more it seems like the citizen gets the short straw in favor of corporations and agencies who can shove more money into powerful pockets.
What are our courts doing with themselves and our rights lately anway? Where is our privacy going and why is the access to that information being given to non government corporations without government mediation? Recently Bush made the move to hold harmless phone companies for illegal wire tapping, and the House passed a bill to allow the RIAA to take your property(and all the info on it probably). At least in 1984, our rights to privacy were being pillaged by the government, here and now they're being pillaged by the companies from whom we buy our goods and services. Who exactly is running this country anyway?
Updated: Tuesday, 8 July 2008 11:05 AM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink | Share This Post
Mood:
Topic: Oh So Shiny

Chris Antemann's Lust & Gluttony sculpture(via Art MoCo) brings new life and interest to the form of figurine that would normally be walked passed in my grandmother's house. I admit I love those old figurines, and even more the anomalies that weren't supposed to be strange when they were made. Antemann's work seems to capitalize on this and add so much more depth and playfulness at the same time.
I would be both wary and excited to drink from Kacper Hamilton's Seven Deadly Glasses (via Serious Eats). I love wine, and I love creative depictions of religious conceptions done in surprising media. This glass collection is amazing in its inventiveness. Even better are Hamilton's own words on his creation, "The ‘7 Deadly Glasses’ are about celebrating passion and encouraging the user to be sinful in a theatrical fashion."
Mood:
Topic: miscellanea

Mood:
Topic: Hmmm?
Sometimes I really love how newspapers have made their online articles comment friendly online. While I was reading Tennant and District Times of Australia article: UFOs frighten Marlinja family, I found a reference in the comments to something called Nibiru and how its impending approach is causing the increasing occurrences of UFOs.
My interest is always peaked when a hitherto unknown group of die-hards or a secret society or subculture is hinted at. I only dabble in reading things like Paranormal Magazine regularly, so I had never heard of a 10th planet on an extended elliptical orbit that's next coming was predicted by a thousands of years old Sumerian myth.
For those of you who do also not know, and who often haunt areas of the book store that are not the Paranormal and New Age section--here's what I found out. Nibiru was written by in depth by Zecharia Sitchin. Before Sitchin, the Sumerian myth of a race of aliens who mined Earth for its gold and genetically altered apes to be the superworker human race and the anomalies in the orbits of Uranus and Neptune. There has also been an anomalous space object spotted in the direction of Orion in 1983 which was speculatively dubbed Planet X. For believers of Stichin, this Planet X is Nibiru, and its approach will cause something akin to the end of the world.
What I find interestingly thorough about the Nibiru researchers claims is that almost every astronomical prediction for the coming years--the pole shifting, the massive earth changes--can all be tied into the gravitational upset that will happen when Nibiru arrives. The great flood, Sumerian and Egyptian technological advances, and all can also be tied into Nibiru's and its inhabitants effect on our planet. Like so many other wholly-too-large-to-be-comprehended or proven theories about our planet, individual acceptance of Nibiru's existence is a faith thing.
About.com's Paranormal Phenomena article
Mood:
Topic: Oh So Shiny Home
It's no surprise that I, once again, will be extolling the wonder of things that are more than the things they are. I do so love built in surprise and function and decoration. So, today we are looking at awesome tables that are more than they are/or appear to be.
Vase table from Paul Loebach (via Design Milk), and Play coffee table from BCXSY (via Apartment Therapy).

Sheep from Itay Ohaly (via MoCo Loco), Daydream coffee table by Yu Zhao (via Apartment Therapy).
